He, as so many 'jews', by dwelling on waves and ripples of 'jewish' crimes only, and never working on solution- and actually condemning some cures for the illls- are as the persian saw says, Lke a man who plows and plows and never sows.
In other words, they approbate theft of land and terrorist acts by the 'jews' and at the same time pretend that they are for a twostate solution. This, means that they want to reward war criminals. They shld actually be prosecuted- dead and living.
Rewarding these criminals cannot lead to any good. It may prod others in their wish to expel and kill other indigenes.
tnx

Excerpt:

humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2007/03/endless-red-herrings.html

"First let me genuinely once again acknowledge the debt of gratitude that I have for you being my teacher most of my adult life. We have a saying in Urdu, loosely translated, it says – 'the cat is the auntie of the lion'. It means the cat taught everything to the lion, except to climb the tree. Obviously to save its own skin. In our culture, as well as I am sure in other cultures, we often refer to experts and teachers and other specialists who hold things back from their students and under-studies, with similar phrases. Such a phrase, is entirely unjust for you. You have indeed never held anything back as far as teaching your mind to anyone and everyone who has wanted to learn. And for this, I am most grateful. And to some tiny extent, I am applying the skills learnt from you, to attempt to disarm you, and other Zionists like you, intellectually speaking. I am not an intellectual, nor an erudite scholar, but a mere ordinary person who is now a minor social worker [..] and a small time grass-roots justice activist. To the extent I succeed in checking you, it must surely make you happy that you taught well. To the extent I fail, it is my own shortcomings and a limitation of my own small mind."

And that "small[ish] mind" dares to note the following conundruem: Noam Chomsky also advocated this: "In swing states vote Obama without illusions"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kNpNzDoH1II

Whereas, an ordinary plebeian, mind you not "arguably the most important intellectual alive", advocated the following before it was fait accompli, before it became irreversibly ex post facto truth open for narration by all and sundry:

Not-Voting is a 'YES' vote to Reject a Corrupt System which thrives on the facade of Elections and Democracy!

humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2008/10/not-voting-is-yes-vote-to-reject-system.html

And the 'untermensch' plebeian, along with a handful of other plebes, also perceptively stated the obvious before it was apparently obvious to the voice of moral-activism, Noam Chomsky:

Mr. Obama – The Post Modern Coup:

print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2008/11/mr-obama-thepostmoderncoup-heather.html

So, what a remarkable discovery to make ex post facto, for the 'arguably most important intellectual alive', that “There is basically no significant change …"

I am rather puzzled by Prof. Noam Chomsky. I do not know what to make of his life of dissent, one which boldly hectors power, while expounding its axioms. I have deconstructed a lot of Chomsky-speak which can be found at Project Humanbeingsfirst.org

The only sensible conclusion I can reach, is to be forensic in one's acceptance of another's speech. That palpable truism applies as much to accepting anything from any priest, as to Noam Chomsky, and as to anyone else, including to accepting anything on faith from this plebeian scribe.

One may not give up one's own judgement just because of priesthood and sainthood of the leading voices which fabricate and mold opinions by virtue of their name. Sometimes they are right, sometimes they are wrong, and sometimes they calculatingly tell lies, half-truth, and remain part of a complex Hegelian Dialectic serving the very interests they purport to be against. The responsibility of the intellectual, and its flock, was noted on the 40th anniversary of Noam Chomsky's famous treatise on the truth-telling moral responsibility of the intellectual:

humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2007/03/responsibility-of-intellectuals-redux.html

Truth-telling is not one blanket statement, nor an everlasting certificate for a previous truth-telling, it's test is ongoing, daily, constant, just like the fabled Jewish moralist continually remind their flock. And if I'd be pemitted to use that fantastic diction in this context as well despite it being for a very different one, here is that wisdom in full bloom:

"Although the Holocaust inflicted horrible injustice upon us, it did not grant us certificate of everlasting righteousness. The murderers where amoral; the victims were not made moral. To be moral you must behave ethically. The test of that is daily and constant."

Many of us ordinary mortals probably fail that test, if not every day, then surely on some days. Why give a blank check to the intellectual?

Thank you.

Zahir Ebrahim
Project Humanbeingsfirst.org

Hey, take it EZ on 'Ol man Chomsky. I met Noam Chomsky doing R&R in Paris long ago (1975) after returning from combat as a fighter pilot in Vietnam disillusioned about the massacre of some 3.7m Vietnamese, Laotions and Cambodian's, and he taught me more about human self actualization and analyzing the psychological profiles of hoodlums like Richard Nixon, Henry Kissinger, Elliot Abrams, Richard Negroponte, Richard Perle and Robert McNamara. I considered him the Jewish Ghandi long after we parted to never meet or speak again.

With the death of Edward Said, the world lost a great philosopher and peacemaker too (though he never had a chance to do his stuff from a position of power) – but, it you read his books, you realize what a decent human being he truly was also.

When Choam dies I do not see who will replace him either.

TheAZCowBoy
Tombstone, AZ.

Pssst, enough with your conspiracy theories, 'TheWholeTruth.'

http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=255842

"I mean, who knows? And who cares? I mean plenty of people get killed all the time. Why does it matter that one of them happened to be John F Kennedy?" (See YouTube broadcast "The Shame of Noam Chomsky & left gatekeepers" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhrZ57XxYJU )

Chomsky occurs to me as a very cunning at distracting from the root causes–drawing focus to peripheral problems, yet keeping the attention from the real evildoers of the earth.

Watch CORE OF CORRUPTION and 911 MISSING LINKS…also visit http://whodidit.org/cocon.html

Written by m.idrees