Avoidance of honest interpretation of history by Jews has made them and their children oblivious to the role of previous Jews in precipitating negative reactions to them. IF YOU ARE JEWISH AND READING THIS, MAKE AN EFFORT NOW TO FULLY UNDERSTAND ALL THIS.

Over the past centuries, Jewish communities have been harassed in and/or driven out of almost every European country.

Why?

From "The Problem is Chutzpah":

If Jews have been simply disliked, why did this dislike occur time and again only after a period of warmth and cooperation with Gentiles? Jews in early fourteenth century Spain were prominent in positions of privilege and power and intermixed with, even married, the natives. LATER sentiment against Jews arose. Jews were prominent in the Weimar regime of Germany. There was much intermixing of Jews and Germans. LATER sentiment against Jews arose. Similarly in the USSR and the Soviet satellites.
Somehow repeatedly the non-Jews got quite fed up with the Jews. Even in texts written by Jews there are hints why. The book Hitler’s Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust, by Daniel Jonah Goldhagen, contains references by contemporary “antisemites” to “wealth (Jews) amassed through thieving and cheating” (to which Palestinians can relate) and the idea that Jewish absence would “make the German people again the master in its own house” (to which Americans can relate).

We hear always that pograms and persecutions took place. Rarely we get a glimpse of what motivated them. But, briefly, in his book The Fatal Embrace: Jews and the State, Benjamin Ginsberg mentions Czechoslovakians being irritated by “tremendous influence” of Jews and “animosities” caused by “Jews in the government” being cited as the cause of a pogram in Poland.

The Fatal Embrace importantly observes that Jews, through the centuries of their diaspora, frequently have assumed unpopular and coercive roles in government, such as that of tax collector and inspector. They characteristically have striven for positions within the frameworks of power. They have tended to be partisan, moreover, forming close ties with particular regimes; these ties would haunt them when regime change later occurred. Jews were highly associated with Soviet block Communism, being mutually supportive and probably mutually discrediting.

These, and many other, references and my own personal observations indicate that Jews strive at life, at progress and prosperity, with exceptional gusto. Their drive and assertiveness is overweening to non-Jews and puts non-Jews at a considerable relative disadvantage. Therein lies the problem. They’re just too pushy, they’re hard to compete with.

Observing this, and determining to protect against Nazi-type actions, what should we do? Give the Jews a state of their own? What sense would this make? Why would you take high-performance people and put them in a team of their own? A super team that in a global community would outcompete and annoy the rest of us.

And, indeed, this is exactly what they have done. They’ve mastered an intricate task that Arabs have only just begun to realize exists: making America do exactly what they want AND with essentially no one who matters cognizant of it. (America is being plundered psychologically, as well as materially, and generally neither Americans nor their Arab foes recognize it.) In fact, what we have seen happen in Palestine is what you would expect if the problem was not (mindless) persecution of Jews, but a big dose of innate Jewish chutzpah."

Since I wrote "The Problem is Chutzpah" a few years ago, a couple other things have come to fascinate and mystify me. One of them is the extent to which individuals want to cling to the Jewish identity. WHAT IS THAT FOR? Obviously, an identification with a specific kind of people, especially if it is essentially gene-based, may certainly, if it is allowed to become very important, collide with the melting-pot, all-people-matter-equally orientation that a world at peace needs.

The other fascinating (and depressing) thing is the inability to change course from the behavior of manipulating powerful governments of essentially Gentile nations to serve the Jewish group, to the detriment of non-Jews, WHICH IS ALWAYS SOONER OR LATER REALIZED BY THE GENTILES TO THE DETRIMENT OF THE JEWS (& non-Jews). IF YOU IDENTIFY YOURSELF AS JEWISH, ASK YOURSELF: WHAT IS THE POINT OF THAT?

http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2008/12/07/who-rules-the-west/

Stephen Harper and John Howard deliver identical speeches – 2003 regards Iraq
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=gOoot6NhkgU

& this may be from 2006 but the links contained take you direct to updated sites:

Zionist Control of Britain – How "Friends of Israel" are creating the United Kingdom of Zion, a nation formerly known as Britain by Andy Hitchcock June 13, 2006 http://www.iamthewitness.com/ZionistControlOfBritain.html

I contend the conflict end when Israel upholds their very own words of May 14, 1948.

The Declaration of the Establishment of Israel

"On the day of the termination of the British mandate and on the strength of the United Nations General Assembly declare The State of Israel will be based on freedom, justice and peace as envisaged by the prophets of Israel: it will ensure complete equality of social and political rights to all its inhabitants irrespective of religion it will guarantee freedom of religion [and] conscience and will be faithful to the Charter of the United Nations."

2008 is the 60th anniversaries of Israel, Nakba and the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

PREAMBLE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS

Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by the rule of law,

Whereas it is essential to promote the development of friendly relations between nations,

Whereas the peoples of the United Nations have in the Charter reaffirmed their faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person and in the equal rights of men and women and have determined to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom,

Whereas Member States have pledged themselves to achieve, in co-operation with the United Nations, the promotion of universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms,

Whereas a common understanding of these rights and freedoms is of the greatest importance for the full realization of this pledge,

Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world,

Whereas disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind, and the advent of a world in which human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief and freedom from fear and want has been proclaimed as the highest aspiration of the common people,

Now, Therefore THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY proclaims THIS UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations, to the end that every individual and every organ of society, keeping this Declaration constantly in mind, shall strive by teaching and education to promote respect for these rights and freedoms and by progressive measures, national and international, to secure their universal and effective recognition and observance, both among the peoples of Member States themselves and among the peoples of territories under their jurisdiction…

Article 13:

(1) Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each state.

(2) Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country.

http://www.wearewideawake.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=107&Itemid=213