What kind of question is that? I don't get a cent, I don't get any information from them at all. They do not know I EXIST, or that this site exists. Does everyone have to have a principalled position based on being paid for it?

also algeria this ilegitime country who is created by france in 1962 like israel in 1948 by british

every thing is clear and they know that morocco will never leave its sahara but europe and USA love see muslims kill each others
they using this groupe polisario against morocco same time they fighting terrorism against their countries

how much money u get from algeria for this ?
on plus polisario does not represente us we are sahroui ,polisario is just half tribe of ghribat called east rghibat who ve been forced to leave morocco by algeria and its groupe polisario a terroriste

we know europe , USA and UN they don't allow terrorism against themself but allowed against morocco (double standar)
we know cuba and venzuella are terroriste countries they helping this group algerian polizario

there is no justice we sahrouis are moroccans we ready to fight for morocco

ceuta and mililia are moroccan we will take them back soon or later

You are talking maybe in good faith about Western Sahara issue but many others in this forum had a vey unbalanced view on the issue. I believe as much as someone has a limited knowledge on (any) issue, he can't be the voice of the parties. It's a very complex issue. It started in a cold war context in the 70' and here we are.

Here and in many places on Internet, Morocco is seen as a colonialist, oppressor…and Polisario leaders are seen as angels. The reality on the ground is far from this simplistic point of view. The unionist sahraouis made the choice to belong to the kingdom of Morocco since 1975. the separatist sahraoui made the choice to spread communism and revolution spirit in North Africa with the support of Lybia then Algeria.

I believe nothing compares Western Sahara issue to the Palestine one. Western sahara is facing the unionist sahraouis to the separatists. It's about a common religon, a common culture, a common history, I should say it's about the same families/tribes. Besides, there is no mention to decolonization in any of the UN resolutions on Western Sahara. All of them are mentioning self-determination but according to the UN self-determination do not mean independence. There are many places where the UN was involved as a peacekeeper party and where the term self-determination was pronnounced without any allusion of independence.

Regading the Palestinian issue, it's facing two countries having two histories, two culture, two religions…The parallelism made in this topic doesn't make sense. Palestine authority is recognized by all western countries. Palestine is seating at the UN as an observer.

Polisario Front exists at the UN thanks to Algeria. The activities of the representative of Polisario Front are controlled by the algerian representation at the UN. The representative of Polisario Front is seating in the algerian office.

I am supporting debating in general as a democrate individual but here in that case there would be only biases and manipulation without any real debate to move forward on the western sahara issue to end the sufferings of innocent people in Tindouf camps south Algeria.

AS

As you can see in his message (my Spanish is horrible, but this much I could read), I did not "tell him to respond", but informed him and others who were aware of the paper that it was on my blog and that people were commenting on it, so they might want to check out the blog so that they could discuss the issue with those who were commenting upon the paper.

So, if you can stop with the accusations, it would be fine for all of you to discuss here, there, anywhere at all you wish and in whatever language you believe is best for you to confront your ideas.
thanks

I believe communism and revolution spirit are dead and will never be again. I believe oppression and sequestration are not the best way to manage people neither to support a cause. Polisario leaders as well as Algeria didn't succeed on imposing "SADR" as a sovereign state despite the propaganda machine orchestrated on Internet since more than a decade with the help of Internet lobbyists and naive students from the left and the north of Europe. Now, it's time to end this absurd cold war conflict. It's time to let western saharians and none-western saharians living in Tindouf camps return back to their homeland. Those people are willing better life conditions more than any state claim. The state claim is the mirage of Polisario/algerian leaders to maintain the rewards.

Your arguments and comments are sterile as the conflict itself.

Comparing Morocco to the nazis doesn't make sense because the nazis and the fascists are the polisario leaders who killed many innocent people in the camps because of their opposition to the actual leaders.

Read this :

http://www.corcas.com/eng/SearchResults/MajorEvent/tabid/868/ctl/Details/mid/1814/ItemID/8240/Default.aspx

We all are in a very mistake: Only you have light and full reason. Western Sahara has belonged to Morocco ever since, before Ala, before Good, before Hassan II, before the United Nations, before every thing.

And not only Western Sahara belonged ever since to Morocco, but also Mauritania, Senegal, Algiers, the Vatican, The United States, Palestine, Japan, Brazil, Timor, Papua, Angola, South Africa, Belgium, Germany, Ossetia and, last but not least, Russia and Iran. Perhaps, also Venezuela and Canada too.

All those who have posted any comment here, all except you and your fellow are liars and crazy people:

¡ HEIL HITLER ! (This man was the most similar to the present governments in Israel and Morocco)

Besides, the majority of sahraouis are unionists. That's an established facts not a mirage and the unionist sahraouis don't want to be under corrupt, incompetent and none-democrate polisario/algerian leaders.

It's a waste to talk again and again about independence. To move forward to a realistic solution, let's talk about the autonomy and its implementation.